Opens in a new tab

Tough Bass Fishing Strategy: Stop Fishing Memories

September 22, 2026

A tough bass fishing strategy sometimes begins with doing something that feels completely wrong: leaving water where you already caught big fish. Luke Kerstetter did exactly that at Watts Bar Lake, and his decision to explore places he had never fished became one of the most useful lessons from a difficult September tournament.

Experienced anglers accumulate waypoints for good reasons, but those locations can quietly turn into instructions instead of information. Learning how bass choose productive ambush zones matters more than repeatedly returning to a coordinate simply because it produced last week, last month or last year.

Tough Bass Fishing Strategy Starts By Questioning What You Know

Kerstetter won the September 19-20 Watts Bar Lake BFL Super Tournament with nine bass totaling 29 pounds, 4 ounces.

Nine fish across two tournament days tells you immediately that this was not an easy numbers event.

Early on Day 1, however, Kerstetter found exactly what every tournament angler wants. He caught two bass around the 6-pound mark within roughly an hour while fishing a ChatterBait Jack Hammer.

He could have spent the rest of the day guarding that water.

Instead, the difficult overall fishing convinced him that one good spot was not enough.

In the Watts Bar winning pattern, Kerstetter explained that he deliberately explored water he had never fished so he could approach it without bias.

That decision deserves more attention than the lure.

Favorite Waypoints Can Make Anglers Stop Observing

A waypoint is a record of something that happened.

It is not a promise that it will happen again.

That distinction becomes especially important during seasonal transitions, when forage moves, vegetation changes and bass reposition across relatively short periods.

The problem with favorite locations is psychological. Once an angler believes a spot should produce, every clue gets interpreted through that expectation.

One missed strike becomes proof fish are still there. One small bass earns another 30 minutes. An empty sonar screen gets explained away because “they’ll move up eventually.”

Meanwhile, unfamiliar water forces sharper observation.

There is no history to defend.

You have to ask basic questions again: Where is the bait? What depth has healthy vegetation? Which ditch has life? Is there current? Are bass actually present?

That is fishing evidence instead of memories.

Copy The Pattern, Not The GPS Coordinate

Kerstetter was not simply running around Watts Bar hoping to accidentally collide with another big bass.

His better fish were associated with schooling gizzard shad around grass ditches approximately 8 feet deep. Threadfin shad were also present, but he believed the larger bass he caught had been feeding heavily on gizzard shad.

That gives anglers something far more useful than one tournament waypoint.

It gives them ingredients.

The state’s Watts Bar fishing guidance identifies both threadfin and gizzard shad as important largemouth forage and points anglers toward grassy areas during fall, when bass can follow concentrated bait into creeks and embayments.

So if one 8-foot grass ditch holding gizzard shad produces quality bass, the next move is not automatically returning to that exact ditch.

Search for another place with comparable depth, vegetation and forage.

That is pattern fishing at its best.

The waypoint records where a pattern worked. The angler’s job is figuring out why.

Use Good Fish To Buy Yourself Search Time

Catching two quality bass early changes the risk equation.

For a tournament angler, those fish provide weight already secured in the livewell. For a recreational angler, an early productive stretch confirms that the day is not completely broken.

That can be the perfect moment to explore.

Kerstetter spent much of the remainder of Day 1 effectively practicing for Day 2. He caught additional fish but did not improve his existing weight.

That does not make the search unsuccessful.

He gained information.

This approach requires discipline because staying on known fish feels safer. But on exceptionally difficult days, information about three additional areas can be more valuable than spending four more hours trying to generate one extra bite from a spot already exploited.

Think of an early big fish as permission to investigate.

Do not immediately abandon something exceptional, but recognize when additional casts are providing diminishing information.

Familiar Water Versus New Water

Neither familiar nor unfamiliar water is inherently better. Each offers a different advantage, and good anglers know when to switch from one to the other.

Fishing DecisionFamiliar WaterNew Water
Initial confidenceHighUsually low
Historical informationExtensiveLimited
Bias riskHigherLower
Search efficiencyOften fasterRequires elimination
Observation styleCan become assumption-drivenUsually evidence-driven
Best purposeConfirm a known patternDiscover changing conditions
Main dangerFishing memoriesWasting time without a plan

The mistake is treating exploration as random fishing.

New water becomes useful when you enter it with a pattern hypothesis.

If gizzard shad, 8-foot ditches and vegetation are the clues, eliminate areas that lack those ingredients before making casts. Mapping, sonar and visual observations should shorten the search.

Know When Your History Is Becoming A Liability

Three signals should make an angler question familiar water.

The first is repeated failure under supposedly perfect conditions. If the wind, light, bait and season appear right but the spot remains dead, stop explaining the absence of fish.

The second is changing forage.

Bass rarely owe loyalty to your waypoint when their food has moved elsewhere.

The third is discovering a repeatable clue outside your normal rotation. One quality bite in unfamiliar water can be random. Multiple fish associated with the same depth, grass type or bait concentration deserve investigation.

Kerstetter returned to his original starting area on Day 2 and caught two bass during two passes. After that, he went fishing again and found two more in the Spring Creek area.

That combination is useful: trust proven water enough to check it, but remain willing to expand when it stops providing answers.

Fresh Water Should Challenge Your Theory

The biggest advantage of unfamiliar water is not that fewer people have fished it.

It is that you have fewer excuses for it.

You are forced to judge the water based on what exists in front of you rather than what happened there previously.

That is particularly valuable during September, when bass can be scattered across summer and fall patterns simultaneously. Some fish may follow bait toward creeks while others remain associated with vegetation, ditches or offshore structure.

The goal is not to erase every waypoint.

It is to turn those waypoints back into clues.

A tough bass fishing strategy should use history as a starting point, not a set of handcuffs. Kerstetter’s Watts Bar win showed what can happen when an angler catches quality fish, recognizes that the lake remains difficult and uses that success as an opportunity to learn more water.

Your favorite spot might still be the best place on the lake tomorrow.

But if you never look anywhere else, you are not proving it is the best spot. You are simply proving it is the one you know best.

related articles